• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (7)

Ocean Choice International denied permanent redfish exemption

Fisheries Minister Darin King announced today that Ocean Choice International (OCI) has been denied a permanent redfish exemption.— Photo by Gary Hebbard/The Telegram

Fisheries Minister Darin King announced today that Ocean Choice International (OCI) has been denied a permanent redfish exemption.— Photo by Gary Hebbard/The Telegram

Published on January 6, 2012
The Telegram
Published on January 6, 2012

Fisheries Minister Darin King has confirmed that the provincial government will not approve permanent exemptions to provincial minimum processing requirements for redfish or yellowtail as requested by Ocean Choice International (OCI).

King has also provided an update on the province’s overall progress in reaching a decision on OCI’s groundfish and Fortune proposals.

“In response to OCI’s request for a permanent exemption to minimum processing requirements for redfish and yellowtail, I am confirming today that this request has been denied," said King.

“This type of exemption would be unprecedented. What their request means is that they want no minimum processing requirements for the future. I have decided this request cannot be entertained. There will be no permanent exemption to redfish or yellowtail.”

King said resource prospects and global markets fluctuate and a lot can change in a few years. Catch rates change; other groundfish resources, such as American Plaice, can improve. The provincial government must ensure the long-term security of resources for the benefit of future generations of Newfoundlanders and Labradorians. While some level of multi-year exemption may be considered, a permanent exemption would not be in the province’s best interest.

“Significant progress has been made in the last two weeks in respect to our government’s analysis of OCI’s groundfish proposal,” said King. “However, while the company has been helpful in providing information on the yellowtail portion, information on redfish operations has not been provided as readily and still requires independent validation. This is not helpful, nor does it show government that OCI is serious about their commitment. This is a very serious matter that requires a concerted effort by all parties. People involved deserve a prompt decision, but our government won’t be pressured into a decision without all the information required.”

Information on redfish was first requested two months ago, but all the information has not been provided.

King said it is essential the provincial government receive comprehensive data, which must then be verified by a third party. A decision on potential exemptions to minimum processing requirements cannot be made until the information is disclosed by OCI. The company had requested an answer from the provincial government by Dec. 31 when redfish exemptions were set to expire.

“At the end of December, government was not willing to grant further temporary exemptions while a decision on the overall OCI proposal was being made,” said King. “Yesterday we learned that OCI intends to proceed with plans to fish redfish from quotas purchased from license holders in Nova Scotia. The company has said if we provide an exemption, they will land the fish in Newfoundland and Labrador, otherwise it would be landed elsewhere. We don’t appreciate these types of tactics.”

 King said this action is not helpful or respectful of the province. It again demonstrates the importance for government to protect the province’s interests.

King was stern in his comments towards OCI in a news conference this morning.

“Our government is not interested in playing games," said King. “We want to ensure the maximum benefit for Newfoundland and Labrador in whatever final decisions are made in respect to OCI’s request. That decision can be expected within a few weeks of receipt of all relevant financial and market data.”

 King added that productive discussions on the fishery are long overdue and the provincial government is waiting at the table for all stakeholders to park their agendas and counterproductive tactics and get down to business.

Earle McCurdy, president of the Fish Food and Allied Workers, is expected to speak to reporters about this decision shortly.

Liberal fisheries critic Jim Bennett said King's decision is a good first but government must do more to rebuild the processing sector in the province.

See full story in Saturday's Telegram.

Comments

  • Username
    port union plant worker
    - January 7, 2012 at 11:53:19

    Don I agree---Give the plant in port union to the peaple there and kick the water st merchants like the sullivans out of rural nl all together

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    fintip
    - January 6, 2012 at 13:23:45

    Our fishery and the relevance of rural Newfoundland have, for the moment at least, dodged a bullet. Like others, I had been worried Minister King was about to jump off a cliff - a fundamental error in public policy from which there would have been no way back. I think he seriously considered it but, to his credit, stepped back from the precipice at the last second. Let's hope this marks the point at which the pendulum begins to swing back in the opposite direction for a while. Sure the companies are facing some challenges - especially globalization. But those who have historically depended on the industry for employment and have made it a way of life are struggling even more to cope with change. As for the province, it faces the inescapable reality that much of the leverage it historically exercised over the fishery has evaporated as a result of federal fisheries policies that have not only failed miserably but that are designed in many cases to transfer quotas, landings and revenues out of the province. The province is badly in need of an Atlantic Fisheries Accord that would give it defacto control of the overall fisheries life cycle. To give the devil his due, Harper is nothing if not a leader who recognizes the need to restore to the provinces some of the authority it had or should have had were it not for the extreme centralist views or MacDonald, St. Laurent and most recently Trudeau. Each of these leaders chose to ignore the reality that Canada is a federation rather than the unitary state they would have preferred. The autonomy lost by provinces during their tenure shows signs of being recouped under Harper. Dunderdale needs to take advantage of that mindset in the PMO by opening discussions on a revamped, streamlined fisheries management regime modeled on the Atlantic Accord. Meanwhile, the decision announced by King is a positive sign that our provincial government - which on fisheries matters has been imitating a deer in the headlights - has at least made it to the other side of the road.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Scott
    - January 6, 2012 at 13:19:57

    The people made the decision concerning the fishery... Not Mr King..he only put the out there on their behalf. Mr Bennett wake up and smell flower ...fishery is coming a thing of the pass...for most of people...What you and King need to do...Is get the people back to work. DO SOMETHING FOR YOUR PAY...BESIDE BLOWING WIND.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Cyril Rogers
    - January 6, 2012 at 13:17:34

    I am certainly no fan of the way this government has handled things but I have to commend Minister King for taking this small but vital step to stop the corporates from total domination of our fishery. There is still much to be done and that can be done but he has given himself and the government a chance to move forward on this common property resource. In the short term we can't ask for much more but there is a desperate need for a long term plan based on input by all stakeholders.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    jim
    - January 6, 2012 at 11:26:59

    The European common union already owns most of the fishing rights here in NL thanks to the free trade agreement and other trade-offs in the past. King can take credit all he want's for this decision but the fact is that the main export from NL is it's people not fish.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Don
    - January 6, 2012 at 11:03:03

    Jim Bennett said "government must do more." Well instead of throwing taxpayers money into a never ending sink hole, I have an idea. Turn over the fishery to the FFAW and the Fishermen as how they have all the "right" ideas as to how the fishery should be run.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    About Time Gov't Listened
    - January 6, 2012 at 10:41:12

    NL fish should not be creating jobs in China, even if it means fishermen have to fish for other species. NL First, NL Always.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Packet is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

loading...

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Recent Announcements

Current Obituaries in The Packet

Find an Announcement

Find an Announcement

Advertising